












| |
Supply systems: Just an ever growing compilation of
interesting facts.
Hey Mr. COC
electrician...don't forget you can delegate the responsibility on your COC
between the designer, procurer, installer and tester!
I like it when a plan comes together...now I can register with peace of
mind again. I was not going to sign of on panels and materials or even
installations unless I was there. Yah, whoever runs the dept now did a great
thing. Why should the electrician be held responsible for things he/she did
not do?
but I can see the loggerheads... |
In an enclosure...do
I use a isolator or a circuit breaker?
SANS 6.6.1.17 |
|
|
|
All disconnecting devices in a DB shall be
protected by a SCPD (short circuit protection device aka CB) .
It does
not say where the CB should be, so if it sits in the "sourcing DB" then
only having an isolator for the enclosure /DB is adequate.
But be careful for you
still need to know the kA rating from this source supply because all
switchgear must be able to withstand the PSCC in the circuit.
|
|
|
|
.
|
When building a
panel remember this:
|
IEC |
NEC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Icp or Icw > 10ka
Conditional short circuit current > 17kA
or
Aux circuits connected to transformers >10kA - THE PANEL kA (PSCC)
VERIFICATION PROCESS APPLIES for the panel!
|
409.22 Short-Circuit Current Rating.
An industrial control panel shall not
be installed where the available fault current exceeds its short-circuit
current rating as marked in accordance with 409.110(4).
|
|
|
Methods of verification: |
Methods of
verification?
*The NEC is much much stricter...by UL witnessing tests, how many
witnesses do they have around the world then?
Based on reference design - the manufacturer of the panel
Based on testing
Based on calculation
|
409.110:(4) Short-circuit current rating
of the industrial control panel based on one of the following:
a. Short-circuit current rating of a listed and labelled
assembly
b. Short-circuit current rating established utilizing an
approved method*
*could not find this yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------=======-------- |
SANS |
IEC |
NEC |
|
DB specs
Distribution boards that form part of a fixed electrical installation shall
comply with SANS 1973-1 or SANS 1473-1 or SANS 1973-8. |
|
|
|
|
Are you going to
modify a DB? Read this first:
SANS |
IEC |
NEC |
-- From a SANS point of view.
6.6.6.1 Alterations or extensions on site
to distribution boards with a short circuit
withstand current above 10 kA shall comply with the requirements of
6.6.6.2, and where reports and similar documents are available, apply
a) the rules given in SANS 1973-1 or SANS 1473-1 for the maximum
permissible deviations allowed for a PTTA, or Amdt 5; amdt 6
b) the rules for derivations from the minimally tested ASSEMBLY as in
SANS 1973-8 or from an STA as in SANS 1473-1.
Also
6.6.6.2 When a distribution board is modified or extended, the following
requirements shall apply: Amdt 3
a) the mechanical and electrical integrity of the distribution board shall
not
be infringed;
b) the integrity of the area in a distribution board or a section of a
distribution
board that comprises the conductors (including distribution busbars)
between the main busbars and the supply side of functional units and the
components included in these units, which is regarded as fault free on the
basis of the reduced short-circuit stresses that occur on the load side of
the prospective short-circuit protective device in each unit, is still
applicable; Amdt 3
c) extensions to the busbar systems shall not adversely affect the
electrical
and mechanical performance of the complete busbar system;
d) components shall be selected for their suitability for application taking
into
account information available from the component manufacturers. It might
be necessary to derate the components depending upon environment
and application conditions; Amdt 3
e) any changed properties due to alteration or extension of the distribution
board shall be marked indelibly on a supplementary nameplate; and
Amdt 3
f) the required IP rating shall not be reduced. Amdt 3
161
-- |
|
|
|
|
6.7.1 Overcurrent
protection
SANS |
IEC |
NEC |
NOTE The term
over current protection includes both overload protection (see 6.7.2) and short-circuit protection (see 6.7.3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------==========-----------
Remember this about busbars:
SANS |
IEC |
NEC |
Don't purchase any
busbars unless you check this first SANS 6.6.2.1 - 2008
Unless fully tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/
IEC 60439-1, the current density of copper busbars shall not exceed
2 A/mm2 for currents < 1 600 A, or 1,6 A/mm2 for currents > 1 600 A.
SANS 6.6.4.2.4 Unless tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/IEC 60439-1,
the minimum clearance between phases and between phase and earth
shall be at least 8 mm.
Equipment and components shall comply with the
clearance distances given in the relevant product standards.
Also 6.6.4.3.2 Unless tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/IEC 60439-1,
the minimum creepage distance between phases and between phase and
earth shall be at least 16 mm. Equipment and components shall comply
with the creepage distances given in the relevant product standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An overview on electrical supply changeover systems
Traditionally we
would use contactors - the work horses for electricians - but they are
limited in current.
Then integrated changeover systems came on the market and everything
changed.
The nice thing
about this type of changeover switch, is they go from 40 to 6000Amps,
1 to 4 pole
and they can be manually operated, motorised or a fully automatic.
 | Manually operated? A handle is the only mode of operation. |
 | Motorised? The switch can be operated electrically, but has no
intelligence. Meaning a controller has to be added to tell the switch when
to switch over by virtue of using control signals.
|
 | Automatic? A fully integrated solution. No external components
is required, meaning the switch will monitor the supplies and switchover
according to the supply conditions. Normally they have some means of setup
programming, so the electrical sensing levels and time delays can be
programmed according to the application. |
A frequently asked question is: If the mains failed, how on earth
will the switch know to switch to generator - if it so automatic? (The
"sneer" or sarcasm is invariably present, and I don't know why).
Anyway: For Socomec, they have a internal contact which, when the
MAINS FAILS will trigger a start signal to the generator. After the
generator has started and the supply from the generator is within legal
limits the switch will then use the generator supply to change over and
supply the load from the generator side.
Likewise, when the MAINS power returns the changeover will return to
mains power and open the generator start contact. The generator now
knows to shut down.
When designing this installation it is imperative to confirm that
the generator controller can stop and start the generator automatically
AND a remote start facility is available.
Important considerations for this type of changeover switches:
1: The switch (auto /remote / motorised) controls
should be removable without having to remove / disconnect the actual
switch. ***The electrician will love you for this!
|
2: If the automatic control fails or even if the
controls is removed, the ability to operate the switch-over manually
must remain. |
3: The more flexible the programming
controls is the easier commissioning is for all possible scenarios.
You will not believe how important this can be when you need it.
Lets just take one example: Not having a method to manage
priority between the supplies or simple phase sequence monitoring.
PS: I said flexible - but
simplicity still reigns supreme.
A complicated boeing controller is a huge killer for a changeover
switch installer. |
***I can write all day - and more - about this kind of thing...but
I think for now, this will suffice for the reader. Thank you.
Shall we cover a few manufacturers here?
|
|
On
mains / change over
switches should the neutral not break last and close first on switching
over?
And the standard says:
SANS |
IEC 60364: |
NEC |
|
|
|
4.4.2.3 explicitly says - if you
break the neutral you better do it last (after the phases) and close it
before or at the same time as closing the phases.
That's gonna be a challenge with a contactor assembly, because it does
not give us licence for neutral disconnection at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paralleling conductors:
SANS |
IEC 60364: 4.4.5.4 |
UL |
|
Short circuit protection -The wiring shall be carried out in such a
way as to reduce to a minimum the risk of a short circuit in any parallel
conductor, for example, by protection against mechanical damage, and
conductors shall be installed in such a manner as to reduce to a minimum the
risk of fire or
danger to persons.
b) For two conductors in parallel, a short-circuit protective device shall
be provided at the supply end of each parallel conductor.
c) For more than two conductors in parallel, short-circuit protective
devices shall be provided at the supply and load ends of each parallel
conductor. |
|
--------=========---------
 |
Utilisation categories according
to IEC – 60 947:
The standards for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear. |
|
SANS |
IEC |
UL |
|
Utilisation categories according
to IEC – 60 947
The standards for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear.
*As complete
as I can find to date.
What does this
table mean?
To assist in the correct selection of all switchgear according to set
conditions, the type of load and the duty of switching of the load.
How does this table work?
Why can you have multiple similar applications listed? – Well, one has to
consider that the conditions for the use is first determined by the section
covered by the IEC standard so under different specifications the same
description can be listed.
For instance: -One can switch the load with different characteristics (e.g.
frequent switching or not) or switch the same circuit with the load
connected or not.
Thank you to the following references:
Rockwell Automation - Allen Bradley
Wikipedia
ABB
|
|
|
--------Voltage supplies across the world------
***SE guide 2016 has a comprehensive list of
specific countries l but I don't feel at liberty to use the table here.
Will ask one day.
|
SANS |
IEC |
SANS 10142 |
Low voltage |
|
An international voltage standard for
3-phase 4-wire LV systems is recommended by
the IEC 60038 to be 230/400 V. |
|
Medium voltage |
Covered in part 2 of the code(2009): Between
1000Vac and 22000Vac with up to 3000kw capacity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity: What does the standards say about supplies and
"shared" loads
section 5.2(2009):
SANS |
IEC |
UL |
And accredited person or electrical consultant shall estimate the load of
an installation... but their is an Annex D to assist...but it must not be seen as an
exact method - I can see right through this text that whoever was involved
in this text had no confidence in their doings whatsoever.
Really?
A very nice and complicated way to do this...what is annex D?
I remember when I did contracting we used to have council inspectors to
assist and guide us...He looked at the complex I was doing and at my
proposed calculation...way over sized he says...this is a much more
realistic supply. Wow...experience is priceless. Is there no way to
incorporate experience into regulations like this?
We know for a flat complex consisting of this level of load (some
complexes are for the wealthy and comes with under floor heating and
such...others are for the average person...just the basics) My point is:-
Can we not work on the bases of a basic load requirement per unit and add
any "frills" with diversity factors to ascertain the current capacity of a
specific load. that would be cool!
|
This factor is defined in IEC60050 - International
Electrotechnical Fig. A12: Rated diversity factor for distribution
boards (cf IEC61439-2 table 101)
I do not have this code... ref from SE guide 2016
Diversity factor - Coincidence factor (ks)
It is a matter of common experience that the simultaneous operation of
all installed loads of a given installation never occurs in practice,
i.e. there is always some degree of diversity and this fact is taken
into account for estimating purposes by the use of a factor (ks).
Vocabulary, as follows:
b Coincidence factor:
b Diversity factor:
I got some base information from the SE guide 2016 - but as a bottom
line it seems this diversity factor rules is very much not a local
regulation drive. They mentioned the way the French does it.
|
|
|
|
I measured all the
line currents and they are equal...why do I have a neutral current still
registering...that's not right.
SANS |
IEC |
NEC/UL |
I discovered this in the code: Sans
6.2.11.1 - These neutral currents are due to harmonic content in the
system - usually the third harmonic - that does not cancel in the neutral.
Wow. Now all those times I experienced this mystery ...only now it makes
sense! I actually had a case where a meter was taken as suspect because it
registered strange neutral currents. Wow, If only I knew then!
So I presume this neutral current component is a function of the amount
of harmonics as well.
But this killed me:- The magnitude neutral current due to the third
harmonic may exceed the POWER
FREQUENCY PHASE CURRENT...and it might affect the cables...for
instance if exaggerated by an unbalanced load the neutral conductor might be
undersized. This highly abnormal situation might arise where a cable has to
be sized according to the neutral current because it might be higher then
the phase currents.
|
IEC 4.4.2.2.3 confirms exactly that |
NEC ??? |
|
|
Remember frequency is a consideration in selecting a cable...
SANS |
IEC |
UL |
See SANS
10142-1-2008 6.2.3.4 where the table applies to 49 to 61Hz. Now I know it is
not relevant because we only work with 50/60Hz but it is interesting to
note. A power cable might have to be derated by as much as 50% at 400Hz.
Never knew. See Tables 6.2(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
----------How to calculate the kA of a
battery-----------
And what is this in
the code: How to calculate the kA (Prospective Short Circuit Current)
of a battery.
Is this a good reference book or what - even helps a customer
(electrician) with this kind of thing?
But what does it say Gary: Same as with AC: kA = Vsupply / Total
resistance of the path -including the battery internal resistance. Done.
|
-------------=============---------------
How do I obtain the SCCR for a panel I am building?
There are three options:
1. Purchase previously tested combinations from a major supplier that can
be tabulated in the panel builder’s procedure. Eaton is a major component
supplier that is committed to providing this information to our customers.
Once you have all of the component ratings, either use an outside service or
UL508A Supplement SB.
2. Test each panel construction and record the construction in a
follow-up procedure. With the numerous possibilities for product
combinations within a panel, this option will require a tremendous
investment in testing and maintenance. The test has to be witnessed by a UL
project engineer.
3. Utilize the method described in UL508A Supplement SB.
How do I calculate the Short Circuit Current Rating of a Control Panel
based on UL508A Supplement SB?
There are three simple steps to calculating the SCCR Rating of a control
panel.
 | Step 1: Determine the individual short circuit current rating of each
individual component in the system. All power circuit components, including
disconnect switches, branch circuit protective devices, branch circuit fuse
holders, load controllers, motor overload relays, terminal blocks, and bus
bars, shall have a short circuit current rating expressed in amperes or kilo
amperes and voltage. You can exclude transformers, dry-type capacitors,
resistors, varistors and voltmeters. |
 | Step 2: Calculate the available short
circuit current when taking into account current limiting components like
control power transformers, fuses and circuit breakers. |
 | Step 3: Compare the
values obtained in steps one and two to determine the overall short circuit
current rating of the panel. The lowest rated SCCR of the device within the
control panel must be the one that is marked on the panel. |
|
Ref: Rittal
Enclosure / Control panel testing to UL 508 compared to
IEC
The scope of testing nearly corresponds to the content
of the IEC testing (point 1-5).
The most striking differences are, for example, in the
field of short-circuit testing with the adjustment of phase sequence and the
documentation of test results. The root mean square value (RMS) is preset by
UL at the testing equipment.
The oscillogram shows the surge short-circuit current
at the beginning of the short-circuit current, however it will not be
considered closer in contrast to IEC testings.
UL 508 |
IEC |
The test time is limited to 3 cycles, this
corresponds to 60ms |
. IEC test a value of 1000ms or according to
manufacture's
specifications. |
Merely the end value is changed for the temperature
limits admissible. The required creepage distances and clearances are
divided into feeder and branch circuits. |
|
In short: Feeder-circuits are the infeed and main
busbar area where increased creepage distances and clearances are valid. For
600 V AC this is 25.4 mm clearance und 50.8 mm creepage distance in
accordance with UL 508A. |
(compared to IEC: For 600 VAC industrial
applications; 8 mm clearance und 11 mm creepage distance) |
Branch circuits are in simple terms control circuits
and outputs for electric motors with decreased creepage distances and
clearances. For 600V AC this means in accordance with UL 508A 9.5 mm
clearance and 12.7 mm creepage distance. |
(compared to IEC: For 600V AC industrial applications;
8 mm clearance and 11 mm creepage distance) |
The application field used is classified according to
the last „ Over Current Protection Device“(listed component to UL 489/248,
power circuit-breaker or fuse).
After the last protective device of a
current path with the above described features the branch circuit starts
with reduced creepage distance and clearances.
Everything before the protective device corresponds to feeder
circuits.
This is where a circuit is made between one phase and another, or
earth, without there being a load between them. This enables a high
magnitude of current to flow between the phases or down to earth. |
When
testing to IEC Standards the short circuit is required to be consistent and
repeatable, therefore a bolted connection is made.
Depending on the short circuit current rating of the circuit, either
solid bars or cables are used to connect the phases, or earth, together. |
|
|
There are two short circuit ratings that can be considered within an
assembly, Icc and Icw:
Clause 10.11 is split into tests for the main circuits:
• Outgoing circuits
• Incoming circuit and main busbars
• Connections to the supply side of outgoing units (e.g. distribution
busbars)
• Neutral conductor
• Protective circuit
Depending on the design of the assembly and the certification required, a
combination of tests or all tests may be performed. See below for the Test
Requirements of the assembly.
During short circuit testing, the locking means and hinges of the doors
should remain intact; deformation may result in the test failing to meet the
requirements and may alter the IP rating of the assembly. |
|
|
|
Test Requirements
The assembly will require to be fitted with a set of incoming connection
points L1, L2, L3, N & PE outside the panel to facilitate the connection of
the incoming test supply to the termination points. The connection terminals
required to connect to the short circuit test laboratory supply are shown on
this drawing. These are generally a set of removable terminals connected to
the end of the panel near the incomer.
The test connections consist of a three phase link on the outgoing circuits
(one of each circuit rating) and a phase to earth link on one outgoing
circuit (the largest outgoing circuit).
A three phase link and a phase to
neutral link on the incoming terminals or busbars will be fitted as
required.
For an extendable panel main busbar must be a minimum of 1.6m long and
contain at least one joint, otherwise the panel is classed non-extendable.
|
|
|
|
Go to page about 10.5.3 Short Circuit Withstand Strength of the Protective
Circuit
Find out more about short circuit testing here.
|
|
|
|
|
--------------Control voltage
recommendation:--------------
South Africa SANS 5.3.2:
|
|
|
|
Control circuit voltages
preferably not exceed 230Vac or 110Vdc ---------===========--------
Voltages in South Africa according to the code 5.3.2
standard voltages:
230Vac single phase
230/400V three phase four wire
Tolerance of +-10% - someone should show Escom this!
Declared voltages:
525V 3phase 3wire with tolerance of +-5%
Preferred Dc voltages:
12, 24 and 48Vdc
Other :
60,80, 110, 220, 250 and 500Vdc
Tolerances determined by application.
Control circuit
voltages preferred as 230Vac or 110Vdc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO BE CONMPLETED GARY |
Transient
fault[edit]
A transient fault is a
fault that is no longer present if power is disconnected for a short time and
then restored. Many faults in
overhead power lines are transient in nature.
When a fault occurs, equipment used for
power system protection operate to isolate
the area of the fault. A transient fault will then clear and the power-line can
be returned to service. Typical examples of transient faults include:
In electricity
transmission and
distribution systems an automatic re-close
function is commonly used on overhead lines to attempt to restore power in the
event of a transient fault. This functionality is not as common on underground
systems as faults there are typically of a
persistent
nature. Transient faults may still cause damage both at the site of the
original fault or elsewhere in the network as fault current is generated.
Persistent
fault[edit]
A persistent fault does
not disappear when power is disconnected. Faults in underground
power
cables are most often persistent due to mechanical damage to the cable, but
are sometimes transient in nature due to lightning.[1]
Symmetric
fault[edit]
A symmetric or balanced
fault affects each of the three phases equally. In transmission line
faults, roughly 5% are symmetric.[2]
This is in contrast to an Unsymmetrical fault, where the three phases are not
affected equally. In practice, most faults in power systems are unbalanced.
With this in mind, symmetric faults can be viewed as somewhat of an
abstraction; however, as Unsymmetrical faults are difficult to analyze,
analysis of asymmetric faults is built up from a thorough understanding of
symmetric faults.
Unsymmetrical
fault[edit]
An Unsymmetrical or unbalanced
fault does not affect each of the three phases equally. Common types of
asymmetric faults, and their causes:
 |
line-to-line - a
short
circuit between lines, caused by
ionization
of air, or when lines come into physical contact, for example due to a
broken
insulator. |
 |
line-to-ground - a short circuit between one line
and ground, very often caused by physical contact, for example due to
lightning
or other
storm
damage |
 |
double line-to-ground - two lines come into contact with
the ground (and each other), also commonly due to storm damage. |
Arcing
and bolted faults[edit]
Where the system voltage is high
enough, an
electric arc may form between power system conductors
and ground. Such an arc can have a relatively high impedance (compared to the
normal operating levels of the system) and can be difficult to detect by simple
overcurrent protection. For example, an arc of several hundred amperes on a
circuit normally carrying a thousand amperes may not trip overcurrent circuit
breakers but can do enormous damage to bus bars or cables before it becomes a
complete short circuit. Utility, industrial, and commercial power systems have
additional protection devices to detect relatively small but undesired currents
escaping to ground. In residential wiring, electrical regulations may now
require
Arc-fault circuit interrupters on
building wiring circuits, so as to detect small arcs before they cause damage
or a fire.
When calculating the
prospective short-circuit current
in a circuit, to maximize the value, the impedance of the arc is neglected.
Notionally, all the conductors are considered connected to ground as if by a
metallic conductor; this is called a "bolted fault". It would be
unusual in a well-designed power system to have a metallic short circuit to
ground but such faults can occur by mischance. In one type of transmission line
protection, a "bolted fault" is delibrately introduced to speed up
operation of protective devices.
Analysis[edit]
Symmetric faults can be analyzed
via the same methods as any other phenomena in power systems, and in fact many
software tools
exist to accomplish this type of analysis automatically (see
power
flow study). However, there is another method which is as accurate and is
usually more instructive.
First, some simplifying
assumptions are made. It is assumed that all
electrical generators in the system are in
phase, and operating at the nominal
voltage of the
system.
Electric motors can also be considered to be
generators, because when a fault occurs, they usually supply rather than draw
power. The voltages and
currents are then calculated for this base
case.
Next, the location of the fault
is considered to be supplied with a negative voltage source, equal to the
voltage at that location in the base case, while all other sources are set to
zero. This method makes use of the principle of
superposition.
To obtain a more accurate result,
these calculations should be performed separately for three separate time
ranges:
 |
subtransient is first, and is associated with the largest
currents |
 |
transient comes between subtransient and
steady-state |
 |
steady-state occurs after all the transients have had
time to settle |
An asymmetric fault breaks the
underlying assumptions used in three-phase power, namely that the
load
is balanced on all three phases. Consequently, it is impossible to directly
use tools such as the
one-line diagram, where only one phase is
considered. However, due to the
linearity of power systems, it is usual to consider the
resulting
voltages
and
currents as a
superposition
of
symmetrical components, to which three-phase
analysis can be applied.
In the method of symmetric
components, the power system is seen as a
superposition of three components:
 |
a positive-sequence component,
in which the phases are in the same order as the original system, i.e., a-b-c |
 |
a negative-sequence component,
in which the phases are in the opposite order as the original system,
i.e., a-c-b |
 |
a zero-sequence component,
which is not truly a three-phase system, but instead all three phases are
in phase with each other. |
To determine the currents resulting
from an asymmetrical fault, one must first know the per-unit zero-, positive-,
and negative-sequence impedances of the transmission lines, generators, and
transformers involved. Three separate circuits are then constructed using these
impedances. The individual circuits are then connected together in a particular
arrangement that depends upon the type of fault being studied (this can be
found in most power systems textbooks). Once the sequence circuits are properly
connected, the network can then be analyzed using classical circuit analysis
techniques. The solution results in voltages and currents that exist as
symmetrical components; these must be transformed back into phase values by
using the
A matrix.
Analysis of the
prospective short-circuit current
is required for selection of protective devices such as
fuses
and
circuit breakers. If a circuit is to be properly
protected, the fault current must be high enough to operate the protective
device within as short a time as possible; also the protective device must be
able to withstand the fault current and extinguish any resulting arcs without
itself being destroyed or sustaining the arc for any significant length of
time.
The magnitude of fault currents
differ widely depending on the type of earthing system used, the installation's
supply type and earthing system, and its proximity to the supply. For example,
for a domestic UK 230 V, 60 A TN-S or USA 120 V/240 V supply, fault currents
may be a few thousand amperes. Large low-voltage networks with multiple sources
may have fault levels of 300,000 amperes. A high-resistance-grounded system may
restrict line to ground fault current to only 5 amperes. Prior to selecting
protective devices, prospective fault current must be measured reliably at the
origin of the installation and at the furthest point of each circuit, and this
information applied properly to the application of the circuits.
|
Transformer protection:
|
NEC Art 240.3 |
|
(F) Transformer Secondary Conductors.
Single-phase
(other than 2-wire) and multiphase (other than delta-delta,
3-wire)
transformer secondary conductors shall not be considered to be
protected by the primary overcurrent protective
device.
Conductors supplied by the secondary side of a single phase
transformer having a 2-wire (single-voltage) secondary,
or a three-phase, delta-delta connected transformer having a
3-wire (single-voltage) secondary,
shall be permitted to be
protected by
overcurrent
protection provided on the primary
(supply) side of the transformer, provided
this protection is in
accordance with 450.3 and does not exceed the value determined by
multiplying the secondary conductor
ampacity
by
the secondary-to-primary transformer voltage ratio.
Wow, it took me long to make sense from this.
Meaning: For 2 wire secondary and single
voltage 3-phase delta/delta transformers (the latter paragraph):
Primary "over current" is achieved by the
calculating:-
Secondary conductor ampacity * Ratio(Sec/Prim)
and must comply with 450.3.
I contend that this was not well thought out.
It takes for granted that the secondary wires
will determine the primary conductors to be adequate, which it might
not be.
In fact I have transformer designs where
the wire size is not a function of the VA rating.
I also contend that as an "overload"
protection this protection will never trip.
It is unlikely that anyone would design a
transformer to be working at 100 Percent load capacity, and this
protection design will continue operating under overload conditions
implying that at that time something must a have failed on the load
side and our protection will never activate.
In fact one could short circuit the
secondary and it will never activate.
Any other type of transformer - other then
1-phase, 2 wire secondaries and 3phase delta/delta - shall have its
own dedicated secondary protections (primary protections cannot be
relied on)
|
|
|
|
|