SupplySystems


Electrical theory Acronyms Installation standards Capacitors SupplySystems Automation Sensors Controllers and modules Control and Safety MicroProcessor PCboard References About us

Electrical theory
Acronyms
Installation standards
Capacitors
SupplySystems
Automation
Sensors
Controllers and modules
Control and Safety
MicroProcessor
PCboard
References
About us

 

 

Supply systems: Just an ever growing  compilation of interesting facts.

Hey Mr. COC electrician...don't forget you can delegate the responsibility on your COC between the designer, procurer, installer and tester!

 

I like it when a plan comes together...now I can register with peace of mind again. I was not going to sign of on panels and materials or even installations unless I was there. Yah, whoever runs the dept now did a great thing. Why should the electrician be held responsible for things he/she did not do?

but I can see the loggerheads...

 

In an enclosure...do I use a isolator or a circuit breaker?
SANS 6.6.1.17      
All disconnecting devices in a DB shall be protected by a SCPD (short circuit protection device aka CB) .

It does not say where the CB should be, so if it sits in the "sourcing DB" then only having an isolator for the enclosure /DB is adequate.

But be careful for you still need to know the kA rating from this source supply because all switchgear must be able to withstand the PSCC in the circuit.

 

     

.

 

When building a panel remember this:
  IEC NEC    
         
  For Icp or Icw > 10ka

Conditional short circuit current  > 17kA

or

Aux circuits connected to transformers >10kA - THE PANEL kA (PSCC) VERIFICATION PROCESS APPLIES for the panel!

 

409.22 Short-Circuit Current Rating. An industrial control panel shall not be installed where the available fault current exceeds its short-circuit current rating as marked in accordance with 409.110(4).

 

   
Methods of verification: Methods of verification?

*The NEC is much much stricter...by UL witnessing tests, how many witnesses do they have around the world then?

Based on reference design - the manufacturer of the panel

Based on testing

Based on calculation

 

409.110:(4) Short-circuit current rating of the industrial control panel based on one of the following:
a. Short-circuit current rating of a listed and labelled
assembly
b. Short-circuit current rating established utilizing an approved method*

*could not find this yet?

   
         

--------=======--------

SANS IEC NEC  
DB specs

Distribution boards that form part of a fixed electrical installation shall
comply with SANS 1973-1 or SANS 1473-1 or SANS 1973-8.

 

     

Are you going to modify a DB? Read this first:

SANS IEC NEC
--

From  a SANS point of view.

6.6.6.1 Alterations or extensions on site to distribution boards with a short circuit
withstand current above 10 kA shall comply with the requirements of
6.6.6.2, and where reports and similar documents are available, apply

a) the rules given in SANS 1973-1 or SANS 1473-1 for the maximum
permissible deviations allowed for a PTTA, or Amdt 5; amdt 6
b) the rules for derivations from the minimally tested ASSEMBLY as in

SANS 1973-8 or from an STA as in SANS 1473-1.

Also

6.6.6.2 When a distribution board is modified or extended, the following
requirements shall apply: Amdt 3
a) the mechanical and electrical integrity of the distribution board shall not
be infringed;
b) the integrity of the area in a distribution board or a section of a distribution
board that comprises the conductors (including distribution busbars)
between the main busbars and the supply side of functional units and the
components included in these units, which is regarded as fault free on the
basis of the reduced short-circuit stresses that occur on the load side of
the prospective short-circuit protective device in each unit, is still
applicable; Amdt 3
c) extensions to the busbar systems shall not adversely affect the electrical
and mechanical performance of the complete busbar system;
d) components shall be selected for their suitability for application taking into
account information available from the component manufacturers. It might
be necessary to derate the components depending upon environment
and application conditions; Amdt 3
e) any changed properties due to alteration or extension of the distribution
board shall be marked indelibly on a supplementary nameplate; and
Amdt 3
f) the required IP rating shall not be reduced. Amdt 3
161

 

--

   


 

 
6.7.1 Overcurrent protection
SANS IEC NEC

NOTE The term over current protection includes both overload protection (see 6.7.2) and short-circuit protection (see 6.7.3).

 

   
     

----------==========-----------

Remember this about busbars:

SANS IEC NEC
Don't purchase any busbars unless you check this first SANS 6.6.2.1 - 2008

Unless fully tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/ IEC 60439-1, the current density of copper busbars shall not exceed 2 A/mm2 for currents < 1 600 A, or 1,6 A/mm2 for currents > 1 600 A.

SANS 6.6.4.2.4 Unless tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/IEC 60439-1, the minimum clearance between phases and between phase and earth
shall be at least 8 mm.

Equipment and components shall comply with the clearance distances given in the relevant product standards.

Also 6.6.4.3.2 Unless tested in accordance with SANS 60439-1/IEC 60439-1,
the minimum creepage distance between phases and between phase and earth shall be at least 16 mm. Equipment and components shall comply with the creepage distances given in the relevant product standards.

 

   
     
 

An overview on electrical supply changeover systems

Traditionally we would use contactors - the work horses for electricians - but they are limited in current.

Then integrated changeover systems came on the market and everything changed.

The nice thing about this type of changeover switch, is they go from 40 to 6000Amps, 1 to 4 pole and they can be manually operated, motorised or a fully automatic.  

bulletManually operated? A handle is the only mode of operation.
bulletMotorised? The switch can be operated electrically, but has no intelligence. Meaning a controller has to be added to tell the switch when to switch over by virtue of using control signals.                                      
bulletAutomatic? A fully integrated solution. No external components is required, meaning the switch will monitor the supplies and switchover according to the supply conditions. Normally they have some means of setup programming, so the electrical sensing levels and time delays can be programmed according to the application.

A frequently asked question is: If the mains failed, how on earth will the switch know to switch to generator - if it so automatic? (The "sneer" or sarcasm  is invariably present, and I don't know why).  

Anyway: For Socomec, they have a internal contact which, when the MAINS FAILS will trigger a start signal to the generator. After the generator has started and the supply from the generator is within legal limits the switch will then use the generator supply to change over and supply the load from the generator side.

Likewise, when the MAINS power returns the changeover will return to mains power and open the generator start contact. The generator now knows to shut down.

When designing this installation it is imperative to confirm that the generator controller can stop and start the generator automatically AND a remote start facility is available.

Important considerations for this type of changeover switches:

1: The switch (auto /remote / motorised) controls should be removable without having to remove / disconnect the actual switch.

***The electrician will love you for this!

 

2: If the automatic control fails or even if the controls is removed, the ability to operate the switch-over manually must remain.

 

3: The more flexible the programming controls is the easier commissioning is for all possible scenarios.

You will not believe how important this can be when you need it.

Lets just take one example: Not having a method to manage priority between the supplies or simple phase sequence monitoring.   

PS: I said flexible - but simplicity still reigns supreme.

A complicated boeing controller is a huge killer for a changeover switch installer. 

***I can write all day - and more - about this kind of thing...but I think for now, this will suffice for the reader. Thank you.

Shall we cover a few manufacturers here?

Socomec    

Atys
   

 

   
     
 

On mains / change over switches should the neutral not break last and close first on switching over?

And the standard says:

SANS IEC 60364: NEC    
 

4.4.2.3 explicitly says - if you break the neutral you better do it last (after the phases) and close it before or at the same time as closing the phases.

That's gonna be a challenge with a contactor assembly, because it does not give us licence for neutral disconnection at the same time.

 

     

 

 

 

Paralleling conductors:

SANS IEC 60364: 4.4.5.4 UL
  Short circuit protection -The wiring shall be carried out in such a way as to reduce to a minimum the risk of a short circuit in any parallel conductor, for example, by protection against mechanical damage, and conductors shall be installed in such a manner as to reduce to a minimum the risk of fire or
danger to persons.

b) For two conductors in parallel, a short-circuit protective device shall be provided at the supply end of each parallel conductor.
c) For more than two conductors in parallel, short-circuit protective devices shall be provided at the supply and load ends of each parallel conductor. 
 

--------=========---------

bullet

Utilisation categories according to IEC – 60 947: The standards for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear.

 

SANS IEC UL
 

Utilisation categories according to IEC – 60 947
The standards for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear.

*As complete as I can find to date.

What does this table mean?

To assist in the correct selection of all switchgear according to set conditions, the type of load and the duty of switching of the load.

How does this table work?

Why can you have multiple similar applications listed? – Well, one has to consider that the conditions for the use is first determined by the section covered by the IEC standard so under different specifications the same description can be listed.

For instance: -One can switch the load with different characteristics (e.g. frequent switching or not) or switch the same circuit with the load connected or not.

Thank you to the following references:

Rockwell Automation - Allen Bradley

Wikipedia

ABB

 

 

--------Voltage supplies across the world------

***SE guide 2016 has a comprehensive list of specific countries l but I don't feel at liberty to use the table here. Will ask one day.

  SANS IEC SANS 10142
Low voltage   An international voltage standard for 3-phase 4-wire LV systems is recommended by
the IEC 60038 to be 230/400 V.
 

 

 

Medium voltage Covered in part 2 of the code(2009): Between 1000Vac and 22000Vac with up to 3000kw capacity.    
       
       
 

Diversity: What does the standards say about supplies and "shared" loads section 5.2(2009):

SANS IEC UL
And accredited person or electrical consultant shall estimate the load of an installation...

but their is an Annex D to assist...but it must not be seen as an exact method - I can see right through this text that whoever was involved in this text had no confidence in their doings whatsoever. Really?

A very nice and complicated way to do this...what is annex D?

I remember when I did contracting we used to have council inspectors to assist and guide us...He looked at the complex I was doing and at my proposed calculation...way over sized he says...this is a much more realistic supply. Wow...experience is priceless. Is there no way to incorporate experience into regulations like this?

We know for a flat complex consisting of this level of load (some complexes are for the wealthy and comes with under floor heating and such...others are for the average person...just the basics) My point is:- Can we not work on the bases of a basic load requirement per unit and add any "frills" with diversity factors to ascertain the current capacity of a specific load. that would be cool!

 

This factor is defined in IEC60050 - International Electrotechnical

Fig. A12: Rated diversity factor for distribution boards (cf IEC61439-2 table 101)

I do not have this code... ref from SE guide 2016

Diversity factor - Coincidence factor (ks)
It is a matter of common experience that the simultaneous operation of all installed loads of a given installation never occurs in practice, i.e. there is always some degree of diversity and this fact is taken into account for estimating purposes by the use  of a factor (ks).
 

 Vocabulary, as follows:
b Coincidence factor:
b Diversity factor:

I got some base information from the SE guide 2016 - but as a bottom line it seems this diversity factor rules is very much not a local regulation drive. They mentioned the way the French does it.

 

 

 

I measured all the line currents and they are equal...why do I have a neutral current still registering...that's not right.

SANS IEC NEC/UL
I discovered this in the code: Sans 6.2.11.1 - These neutral currents are due to harmonic content in the system - usually the third harmonic - that does not cancel in the neutral. Wow. Now all those times I experienced this mystery ...only now it makes sense!

I actually had a case where a meter was taken as suspect because it registered strange neutral currents. Wow, If only I knew then!  

So I presume this neutral current component is a function of the amount of harmonics as well.

But this killed me:- The magnitude neutral current due to the third harmonic may exceed the POWER FREQUENCY PHASE CURRENT...and it might affect the cables...for instance if exaggerated by an unbalanced load the neutral conductor might be undersized. This highly abnormal situation might arise where a cable has to be sized according to the neutral current because it might be higher then the phase currents.

 

IEC 4.4.2.2.3 confirms exactly that NEC ???

 

 

 

 

Remember frequency is a consideration in selecting a cable...
SANS IEC UL
See SANS 10142-1-2008 6.2.3.4 where the table applies to 49 to 61Hz. Now I know it is not relevant because we only work with 50/60Hz but it is interesting to note. A power cable might have to be derated by as much as 50% at 400Hz. Never knew. See Tables 6.2(a)    

 

----------How to calculate the kA of a battery-----------

And what is this in the code: How to calculate the kA (Prospective Short Circuit Current)  of a battery.

Is this a good reference book or what - even helps a customer (electrician) with this kind of thing?

But what does it say Gary: Same as with AC: kA = Vsupply / Total resistance of the path -including the battery internal resistance. Done.

-------------=============---------------

 

How do I obtain the SCCR for a panel I am building?

There are three options:

1. Purchase previously tested combinations from a major supplier that can be tabulated in the panel builder’s procedure. Eaton is a major component supplier that is committed to providing this information to our customers. Once you have all of the component ratings, either use an outside service or UL508A Supplement SB.

2. Test each panel construction and record the construction in a follow-up procedure. With the numerous possibilities for product combinations within a panel, this option will require a tremendous investment in testing and maintenance. The test has to be witnessed by a UL project engineer.

3. Utilize the method described in UL508A Supplement SB.

How do I calculate the Short Circuit Current Rating of a Control Panel based on UL508A Supplement SB?

There are three simple steps to calculating the SCCR Rating of a control panel.

bullet Step 1: Determine the individual short circuit current rating of each individual component in the system. All power circuit components, including disconnect switches, branch circuit protective devices, branch circuit fuse holders, load controllers, motor overload relays, terminal blocks, and bus bars, shall have a short circuit current rating expressed in amperes or kilo amperes and voltage. You can exclude transformers, dry-type capacitors, resistors, varistors and voltmeters.
bulletStep 2: Calculate the available short circuit current when taking into account current limiting components like control power transformers, fuses and circuit breakers.
bulletStep 3: Compare the values obtained in steps one and two to determine the overall short circuit current rating of the panel. The lowest rated SCCR of the device within the control panel must be the one that is marked on the panel.

 

Ref: Rittal

Enclosure / Control panel testing to UL 508 compared to IEC

The scope of testing nearly corresponds to the content of the IEC testing (point 1-5).

The most striking differences are, for example, in the field of short-circuit testing with the adjustment of phase sequence and the documentation of test results. The root mean square value (RMS) is preset by UL at the testing equipment.

The oscillogram shows the surge short-circuit current at the beginning of the short-circuit current, however it will not be considered closer in contrast to IEC testings.

UL 508 IEC
The test time is limited to 3 cycles, this corresponds to 60ms . IEC test a value of 1000ms or according to manufacture's specifications.
Merely the end value is changed for the temperature limits admissible. The required creepage distances and clearances are divided into feeder and branch circuits.  
In short: Feeder-circuits are the infeed and main busbar area where increased creepage distances and clearances are valid.  For 600 V AC this is 25.4 mm clearance und 50.8 mm creepage distance in accordance with UL 508A.

 

 (compared to IEC: For 600 VAC industrial applications; 8 mm clearance und 11 mm creepage distance)
 Branch circuits are in simple terms control circuits and outputs for electric motors with decreased creepage distances and clearances. For 600V AC this means in accordance with UL 508A 9.5 mm clearance and 12.7 mm creepage distance. (compared to IEC: For 600V AC industrial applications; 8 mm clearance and 11 mm creepage distance)
The application field used is classified according to the last „

Over Current Protection Device“(listed component to UL 489/248, power circuit-breaker or fuse).

After the last protective device of a current path with the above described features the branch circuit starts with reduced creepage distance and clearances.

Everything before the protective device corresponds to feeder circuits.

This is where a circuit is made between one phase and another, or earth, without there being a load between them. This enables a high magnitude of current to flow between the phases or down to earth.

 When testing to IEC Standards the short circuit is required to be consistent and repeatable, therefore a bolted connection is made.

Depending on the short circuit current rating of the circuit, either solid bars or cables are used to connect the phases, or earth, together.

   
There are two short circuit ratings that can be considered within an assembly, Icc and Icw:
Clause 10.11 is split into tests for the main circuits:
• Outgoing circuits
• Incoming circuit and main busbars
• Connections to the supply side of outgoing units (e.g. distribution busbars)
• Neutral conductor
• Protective circuit
Depending on the design of the assembly and the certification required, a combination of tests or all tests may be performed. See below for the Test Requirements of the assembly.
During short circuit testing, the locking means and hinges of the doors should remain intact; deformation may result in the test failing to meet the requirements and may alter the IP rating of the assembly.
 
   
Test Requirements
The assembly will require to be fitted with a set of incoming connection points L1, L2, L3, N & PE outside the panel to facilitate the connection of the incoming test supply to the termination points. The connection terminals required to connect to the short circuit test laboratory supply are shown on this drawing. These are generally a set of removable terminals connected to the end of the panel near the incomer.


The test connections consist of a three phase link on the outgoing circuits (one of each circuit rating) and a phase to earth link on one outgoing circuit (the largest outgoing circuit).

A three phase link and a phase to neutral link on the incoming terminals or busbars will be fitted as required.


For an extendable panel main busbar must be a minimum of 1.6m long and contain at least one joint, otherwise the panel is classed non-extendable.

 
   

Go to page about 10.5.3 Short Circuit Withstand Strength of the Protective Circuit
Find out more about short circuit testing here.
 
 
   



 

 

--------------Control voltage recommendation:--------------

South Africa SANS 5.3.2:      
Control circuit voltages preferably not exceed 230Vac or 110Vdc

---------===========--------

Voltages in South Africa according to the code 5.3.2

standard voltages:

230Vac single phase

230/400V three phase four wire

Tolerance of +-10% - someone should show Escom this!

Declared voltages:

525V 3phase 3wire with tolerance of +-5%

Preferred Dc voltages:

12, 24 and 48Vdc

Other :

60,80, 110, 220, 250 and 500Vdc

Tolerances determined by application.

Control circuit voltages preferred as 230Vac or 110Vdc

 

 

     

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
TO BE CONMPLETED GARY

Transient fault[edit]

A transient fault is a fault that is no longer present if power is disconnected for a short time and then restored. Many faults in overhead power lines are transient in nature. When a fault occurs, equipment used for power system protection operate to isolate the area of the fault. A transient fault will then clear and the power-line can be returned to service. Typical examples of transient faults include:

bullet

momentary tree contact

bullet

bird or other animal contact

bullet

lightning strike

bullet

conductor clashing

In electricity transmission and distribution systems an automatic re-close function is commonly used on overhead lines to attempt to restore power in the event of a transient fault. This functionality is not as common on underground systems as faults there are typically of a persistent nature. Transient faults may still cause damage both at the site of the original fault or elsewhere in the network as fault current is generated.

Persistent fault[edit]

A persistent fault does not disappear when power is disconnected. Faults in underground power cables are most often persistent due to mechanical damage to the cable, but are sometimes transient in nature due to lightning.[1]

Symmetric fault[edit]

A symmetric or balanced fault affects each of the three phases equally. In transmission line faults, roughly 5% are symmetric.[2] This is in contrast to an Unsymmetrical fault, where the three phases are not affected equally. In practice, most faults in power systems are unbalanced. With this in mind, symmetric faults can be viewed as somewhat of an abstraction; however, as Unsymmetrical faults are difficult to analyze, analysis of asymmetric faults is built up from a thorough understanding of symmetric faults.

Unsymmetrical fault[edit]

An Unsymmetrical or unbalanced fault does not affect each of the three phases equally. Common types of asymmetric faults, and their causes:

bullet

line-to-line - a short circuit between lines, caused by ionization of air, or when lines come into physical contact, for example due to a broken insulator.

bullet

line-to-ground - a short circuit between one line and ground, very often caused by physical contact, for example due to lightning or other storm damage

bullet

double line-to-ground - two lines come into contact with the ground (and each other), also commonly due to storm damage.

Arcing and bolted faults[edit]

Where the system voltage is high enough, an electric arc may form between power system conductors and ground. Such an arc can have a relatively high impedance (compared to the normal operating levels of the system) and can be difficult to detect by simple overcurrent protection. For example, an arc of several hundred amperes on a circuit normally carrying a thousand amperes may not trip overcurrent circuit breakers but can do enormous damage to bus bars or cables before it becomes a complete short circuit. Utility, industrial, and commercial power systems have additional protection devices to detect relatively small but undesired currents escaping to ground. In residential wiring, electrical regulations may now require Arc-fault circuit interrupters on building wiring circuits, so as to detect small arcs before they cause damage or a fire.

When calculating the prospective short-circuit current in a circuit, to maximize the value, the impedance of the arc is neglected. Notionally, all the conductors are considered connected to ground as if by a metallic conductor; this is called a "bolted fault". It would be unusual in a well-designed power system to have a metallic short circuit to ground but such faults can occur by mischance. In one type of transmission line protection, a "bolted fault" is delibrately introduced to speed up operation of protective devices.

Analysis[edit]

Symmetric faults can be analyzed via the same methods as any other phenomena in power systems, and in fact many software tools exist to accomplish this type of analysis automatically (see power flow study). However, there is another method which is as accurate and is usually more instructive.

First, some simplifying assumptions are made. It is assumed that all electrical generators in the system are in phase, and operating at the nominal voltage of the system. Electric motors can also be considered to be generators, because when a fault occurs, they usually supply rather than draw power. The voltages and currents are then calculated for this base case.

Next, the location of the fault is considered to be supplied with a negative voltage source, equal to the voltage at that location in the base case, while all other sources are set to zero. This method makes use of the principle of superposition.

To obtain a more accurate result, these calculations should be performed separately for three separate time ranges:

bullet

subtransient is first, and is associated with the largest currents

bullet

transient comes between subtransient and steady-state

bullet

steady-state occurs after all the transients have had time to settle

An asymmetric fault breaks the underlying assumptions used in three-phase power, namely that the load is balanced on all three phases. Consequently, it is impossible to directly use tools such as the one-line diagram, where only one phase is considered. However, due to the linearity of power systems, it is usual to consider the resulting voltages and currents as a superposition of symmetrical components, to which three-phase analysis can be applied.

In the method of symmetric components, the power system is seen as a superposition of three components:

bullet

a positive-sequence component, in which the phases are in the same order as the original system, i.e., a-b-c

bullet

a negative-sequence component, in which the phases are in the opposite order as the original system, i.e., a-c-b

bullet

a zero-sequence component, which is not truly a three-phase system, but instead all three phases are in phase with each other.

To determine the currents resulting from an asymmetrical fault, one must first know the per-unit zero-, positive-, and negative-sequence impedances of the transmission lines, generators, and transformers involved. Three separate circuits are then constructed using these impedances. The individual circuits are then connected together in a particular arrangement that depends upon the type of fault being studied (this can be found in most power systems textbooks). Once the sequence circuits are properly connected, the network can then be analyzed using classical circuit analysis techniques. The solution results in voltages and currents that exist as symmetrical components; these must be transformed back into phase values by using the A matrix.

Analysis of the prospective short-circuit current is required for selection of protective devices such as fuses and circuit breakers. If a circuit is to be properly protected, the fault current must be high enough to operate the protective device within as short a time as possible; also the protective device must be able to withstand the fault current and extinguish any resulting arcs without itself being destroyed or sustaining the arc for any significant length of time.

The magnitude of fault currents differ widely depending on the type of earthing system used, the installation's supply type and earthing system, and its proximity to the supply. For example, for a domestic UK 230 V, 60 A TN-S or USA 120 V/240 V supply, fault currents may be a few thousand amperes. Large low-voltage networks with multiple sources may have fault levels of 300,000 amperes. A high-resistance-grounded system may restrict line to ground fault current to only 5 amperes. Prior to selecting protective devices, prospective fault current must be measured reliably at the origin of the installation and at the furthest point of each circuit, and this information applied properly to the application of the circuits.

 

Transformer protection:
  NEC Art 240.3
  (F) Transformer Secondary Conductors. Single-phase
(other than 2-wire) and multiphase (other than delta-delta,
3-wire) transformer secondary conductors shall not be considered to be protected by the primary overcurrent protective
device.

Conductors supplied by the secondary side of a single phase transformer having a 2-wire (single-voltage) secondary,
or a three-phase, delta-delta connected transformer having a
3-wire (single-voltage) secondary, shall be permitted to be
protected by
overcurrent protection provided on the primary
(supply) side of the transformer, provided this protection is in
accordance with 450.3 and does not exceed the value determined by multiplying the secondary conductor
ampacity by
the secondary-to-primary transformer voltage ratio
.

Wow, it took me long to make sense from this.

Meaning: For 2 wire secondary and single voltage 3-phase delta/delta transformers (the latter paragraph):

Primary "over current" is achieved by the calculating:-

Secondary conductor ampacity * Ratio(Sec/Prim)

and must comply with 450.3.

I contend that this was not well thought out.

It takes for granted that the secondary wires will determine the primary conductors to be adequate, which it might not be. 

In fact I have transformer designs where the wire size is not  a function of the VA rating.

I also contend that as an "overload" protection this protection will never trip.

It is unlikely that anyone would design a transformer to be working at 100 Percent load capacity, and this protection design will continue operating under overload conditions implying that at that time something must a have failed on the load side and our protection will never activate.

In fact one could short circuit the secondary and it will never activate.

Any other type of transformer - other then 1-phase, 2 wire secondaries and 3phase delta/delta - shall have its own dedicated secondary protections (primary protections cannot be relied on)  

 

 

 

 

 

SEE HERE FOR THE COMPLETE POST / TOPIC LIST.

 

References: Thank you to the following who unwittingly or wittingly collaborated to build knowledge. For any infringements, apologies. Let us know here:

Copyright issues